|
Canon 77mm UV Haze |  | Brand: Canon
Category: Photography
List Price: $55.00
Buy New: $28.96
as of 7/28/2010 09:30 CDT details
You Save: $26.04 (47%)
New (7) Used (6) from $22.99
Seller: PORTABLE GUY
Rating:  70 reviews
Media: Electronics
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 4.1 x 3.6 x 0.6
MPN: 8-7701
Model: 8-7701
UPC: 082966805882
EAN: 0082966805882
ASIN: B00021OCRO
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | UV haze filter to protect lens from dust, moisture, and scratches | | • | Absorbs roughly 71 percent of UV rays to improve image | | • | Eliminates bluish background haze that obscures some details | | • | Sits on lens at all times for maximum protection | | • | Easily screws onto all 77mm lens |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Canon 77mm Haze UV-1 Glass Filter
Amazon.com Product Description
The Canon 72mm UV haze filter not only helps to protect your lens from dust, moisture and scratches, it also allows you to correct for UV effect and eliminate haze from your photos. This filter will absorb approximately 71 percent of UV rays, helping to eliminate haze's bluish cast that can obscure distant details. This filter easily screws onto your 77mm lenses.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 70
 Good choice for wide angle lenses September 7, 2005
W. Wu (San Francisco, CA USA)
73 out of 79 found this review helpful
This is a good, affordable UV filter for protecting your expensive lenses. I leave it on my lens all the time. This particular filter (L-39 Sharp Cut) is especially good for wide angle lenses (< 24mm focal length), because of its ultrathin profile, which prevents vignetting. I have used regular filters on wide angle lenses, with very bad results. Although this filter is NOT multi-coated, I have not found it to be a big deal in the pictures I've taken. Multi-coated UV filters can cost 2x or 3x the price of this one, which I don't think is worthwhile. All in all, I recommend this filter for Canon or non-Canon lenses.
Does what you want February 21, 2006
Peter Borchard (Boulder, CO)
30 out of 31 found this review helpful
I'm sure there are those who'd wax philosophical over the subject of filters and how one brand is "much better" than another, but for my Canon EF-S 10-22mm on a 20D, I figure Canon would be fairly good at making a filter that they're willing to have branded "Canon." It fits fine, doesn't interfere with the lens hood, looks clear, seems to attenuate that nasty ultra-violet part of the light spectrum and perhaps best of all, protects the front element. What more would one want?
A good piece of gear January 16, 2007
In the Middle of the Road (Connecticut)
15 out of 17 found this review helpful
Canon is getting a reputation for overpriced gear when it comes to advanced amateurs or pros. But there are some minor exceptions. This is one of them.
Canon's price is reasonable compared to others. It's quality is not to be argued with.There are several companies I'd buy filters from based on where I get the best price including shippng. So I've bought several of these. I can't say without a quick invenory how many Canon filters I've bought.
Should you keep a UV or piece of glass on your lens? That;s not a simple call, but generally I'd say yes. When I worked at this for a living, I usually didn't with specific lenses. Some occasions allowed for it, but the effect on optics however trivial is real -- bt only sometimes. Someone who knows about when will know. The others should keep it on. I banged up a lot of lenses. Some had bent filter rings. One had some damage to the front element. It was a Nikon lens bought new. It looked awful and worked fine. I checked the optics against the original test shots and they were the same. A filter wouldn't have protected any lens from some of the things that totaled a couple.
Every lens I buy has a filter of some kind on it within a reasonable period of time. In the small number of cases where I think it matters, I take it off. The result is that I've banged up a couple of filters instead of my lenses. A slip that could have ruined a $1500 lens cost me a $40 filter, assuming I objected to it being scarred up. (actually, I repaied it and repainted it).
Murphy's law says it's going to happen. I bought a new lens last Noember and a filter. As soon as I put the lens on the camerra, the dog showed up and gave the front element a big lick. Carefully leaned it off and put a filter on. I'd have that happen to a lense with a soft coating.
The sharp cut matters on some lenses. But others make an equivalent. If he Canon price is comparable to oen of the other major brands, buy what's easy for you-- or this one
Works great on an Ultra Wide Angle Lens! April 7, 2007
D. Burbank (Ithaca, New York)
7 out of 8 found this review helpful
The "sharp cut" feature of this lens makes it ideal for those Ultra Wide Angle lenses. I purchased this filter for the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Lens. Even at 10mm, there is no vignetting. The lens cap which came with the Sigma 10-22mm fits fine on this filter. I am very satisfied.
Excellent protection for very few dollars January 29, 2007
T. Hernandez (Phoenix, AZ)
7 out of 9 found this review helpful
With the price of new lenses going up all the time, it's in your best interest to spend a few more bucks to protect them. UV haze filters do a great job for very few extra dollars. I have them on both of my new Canon L lenses. They were put on as soon as I took them out of the box. With 25 years of professional photography experience under my belt, I highly recommend this product.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 70
|
|
|
"CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME."Hosted by bulgarianhosting.com.
We hate nikonstop! | |
